This week I upgraded to the Nikon D60 from the previous Nikon D40X model of digital SLR camera (DSLR). The D60 thankfully introduces a good sensor dust-removal system, plus Vibration Reduction (VR) kit lenses (good for resale). The previous model Nikon D40X, which I used from May 2007 to August 2008, required me to tediously correct dust spots in a photo editor. (To be fair in retrospect, correcting dust & scratches was much worse with scanned slide film).
By the way, the new Nikon D90 offers superior resolution with 12 megapixel sensor, a 920,000-pixel 3-inch LCD with live view, and 1280 x 720 (720p) movie support 24fps with mono sound, but its 26 ounce body is much heavier than the 18 ounce D60 or D40X. I currently prefer the lighter weight D60 (or D40X) camera when trekking all day with a camera bag around my shoulders. When combined with the all-in-one Nikkor 18-200mm VR lens (20 ounces), the Nikon D60 (or D40X) offers the best quality for the weight yet invented for active travelers — camera and lens together weigh “just” 38 ounces.
Dynamic Range:
By the way, Nikon’s new Active D-Lighting feature in the Nikon D60 (and D300) only improves dynamic range of JPEG shots, and has no effect on RAW files. Better dynamic range captures more detail simultaneously in both bright and dark parts of images. If you shoot any JPEG files, be sure to use Active D-Lighting (although it delays preview of your latest shot by 2 seconds; and delays the next shot after a quick burst of four).
However, if you only shoot RAW like I do, Nikon’s Active D-Lighting is useless and slows performance, so I don’t use it.
Canon offers a superior dynamic range feature helping both RAW and JPEG, called “Highlight Tone Priority” mode, new in the Canon EOS 40D and Rebel XSi. The Canon Rebel XSi is one of the best lightweight cameras for travel, similar to the Nikon D60 or D40X.
RAW is better than JPEG:
RAW gives you several extra stops of dynamic range versus normal JPEG files on the latest DSLR cameras. RAW also extends the dynamic range of advanced non-SLR compact cameras such as the Canon G9, though by half as much versus a DSLR, due to a smaller sensor. If you need to edit shots after shooting as I do, shooting RAW gives much better quality than JPEG, especially to preserve details in bright highlights, and to change white balance. To get the most out of every image, I recommend using a good RAW editor such as “Adobe Photoshop Lightroom version 2.0″:
Recommended photo management software:
I love Adobe Lightroom version 2.0 (currently selling for $299, or $99 upgrade; or save about 50% with academic discount), which elegantly organizes images, and drastically reduces my time spent in Adobe Photoshop. My photo editing is now quicker than ever from download to edit to output. The excellent upgrade from Lightroom version 1.4 to 2.0 thankfully adds graduated filters, localized editing brushes, and a quicker interface to Photoshop such as for Photomerge, stitching panoramas. It easily and automatically exports image files to handsome web pages, or to files of any size, such as for e-mail or for Microsoft Powerpoint presentations.
The nitty gritty: Adobe Lightroom automatically outputs to standard sRGB color space (or Adobe RGB if desired), while working internally with the broader color space of Adobe RGB or ProPhoto RGB. Adobe Lightroom smartly stores its non-destructive editing commands and labels in a powerful database (and in .XMP sidecar files for RAW), and is compatible with JPG, TIF, most RAW and .XMP files. If you buy a new camera with RAW, check if the latest Lightroom update has added support for its RAW files — for example, Adobe Lightroom version 1.4 added support for the Nikon D60 camera; and version 1.1 added Nikon D40X.
For more details about photographer Tom Dempsey’s current and past equipment (cameras, software, printer, projector, tripod, film, scanner), see: http://www.photoseek.com/camera-history.html